"White Rabbit Visitation" by The Unknown Artist

"White Rabbit Visitation," mixed media computer graphics and oil on canvas art by The Unknown Artist

 

"The Same Difference" by The Unknown Artist

"The Same Difference," mixed media computer graphics and oil on canvas art by The Unknown Artist

 

"HklR2C" by The Unknown Artist

"HklR2C," mixed media computer graphics and oil on canvas art by The Unknown Artist

 

"The Performer" by The Unknown Artist

"The Performer," mixed media computer graphics and oil on canvas art by The Unknown Artist

 

"Wedding Bells" by The Unknown Artist

"Wedding Bells," mixed media computer graphics and oil on canvas art by The Unknown Artist

 

"Grub Time Approaches" by The Unknown Artist

"Grub Time Approaches," mixed media computer graphics and oil on canvas by The Unknown Artist

 

"As the Dawn Flows In" by The Unknown Artist

"As the Dawn Flows In" was created using mixed media computer graphics and oil on canvas art by The Unknown Artist.

 

The world's population of living persons has gone to pot!

Counting Mother and Father Ancestors

Let's just see how many ancestors you must have when you and each one of them has a mother and a father. 

It doesn't matter if a mother died in childbirth as long as her baby survived and grew up to birth another live baby who likewise survived, grew up, and gave birth. It doesn't matter if the father died right after the baby was born under the same conditions. This study doesn't count siblings as ancestors, unless there was some incest involved, and that doesn't affect the results below.

You must have had a mother and father, so that's 2.

Each of them had a mother and father, so that makes 4 more. They now total 6 cumulatively.

Each of your grandparents had to have had a mother and father, and you have 4 of them so that makes 8 more, and so on.

It really works like this: each person, living or dead, has 2 people who were their mother and father.

Each generation back doubles that number, so in the 4 generations before you (not counting you) there had to be a total 2 times 2 times 2 time 2 mothers and fathers in that generation (which equals 16).

Using this simple arithmetic, it is easy to see that you have the blood of many people, direct ancestral mothers and fathers, in your veins, but how many depends upon how far back you want to look.

Let's go back to the year 1900 for an initial look. If the average span of time between generations were only 20 years (which would be rather short), and if you turned 20 as of your birthday in 2020, (assuming for the sake of simplicity that the date today is January 1, 2021, which I know it is not yet), that means you were born in 2000, and you parents were born in 1980, and so on for 4 more generations back in time like this--

Gen#     Relationship to you           Year born       # of Mothers and Fathers
0           You                                         2000        0 (we are not counting you)
1     Parents                                          1980        2
2     Grandparents                                 1960        4
3     Great Grandparents                        1940        8
4     Great Great Grandparents               1920      16
5     Great Great Great Grandparents     1900       32

The cumulative total number of only your mothers and fathers since 1900, 100 years before you were born, is 62 (2+4+8+16+32).

Let's see how many that makes going back 200 years. How many of your ancestral mothers and fathers are in each generation and could contributed to the cumulative total 200 years previously, or since 1820 (assumed 2020-200).

Your generation chart keeps going backwards from 1900 in generations and accumulates more ancestors.


Gen#     Relationship to you                                                 Year born  #in gen    Cumulative
6     Great Great Great Great Grandparents                               1880         64             126
7     Great Great Great Great Great Grandparents                      1860       128             254
8     Great Great Great Great Great Great Grandparents            1840       256             510
9     Great Great Great Great Great Great Great Grandparents   1820       512          1,022

Your 9th generation back had to have 512 mothers and fathers, i.e. 256 mothers and 256 fathers; and that made the total cumulative number of only your direct mother and father ancestors since 1820 be 1,022.

It doesn't stop there. You will see that by the year of their births in 1360 A.D., the required number of your direct mother and father ancestors exceeds the currently claimed estimated population of living persons in the entire world since the beginning of mankind, i.e. 7.7 billion now after 220,000 years of human history! (see the Wikipedia statement near the end)

In the table below, you can see that in 1340 A.D. your family had to have had more mothers and fathers in that single generation than all of living mankind now has since its beginning 220,000 years ago (at least according Wikipedia's estimate shown below).

Gen#   Year born       # in gen        Cumulative # of Ancestors   
10       1800                1,024                     2,046        
11       1780                2,048                     4,094        
12       1760                4,096                     8,190        
13       1740                8,192                   16,382    
14       1720              16,384                   32,766    
15       1700              32,768                   65,534    
16       1680              65,536                 131,070    
17       1660            131,072                 262,142    
18       1640            262,144                 524,286    
19       1620            524,288              1,048,574    
20       1600         1,048,576              2,097,150    
21       1580         2,097,152              4,194,302    
22       1560         4,194,304              8,388,606    
23       1540         8,388,608            16,777,214    
24       1520       16,777,216            33,554,430    
25       1500       33,554,432            67,108,862    
26       1480       67,108,864          134,217,726    
27       1460     134,217,728          268,435,454    
28       1440     268,435,456          536,870,910    
29       1420     536,870,912       1,073,741,822    
30       1400  1,073,741,824       2,147,483,646    
31       1380  2,147,483,648       4,294,967,294    
32       1360  4,294,967,296       8,589,934,590    
33       1340  8,589,934,592     17,179,869,182

That is 8 billion, 589 million, 934 thousand, 592 people, counting just mothers and fathers, in just your 33rd generation back, or you would not be here. And that happened in 1340 A.D.

If we keep counting back from there, by the year 1580 B.C., 3,580 years ago, your 179th generation's count of just mothers and fathers had to have been
    766,247,770,432,944,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

Sorry, I can't say that number for you.    That is the number of mothers and fathers required in that one generation back in 1580 B.C. for you to even exist today. Me, too, so that makes it required that we double that amount to account for both of our ancestors, unless we are related as siblings, which we are not.

For the skeptics who want the average span between generations to be the human maximum of 45 years, which is ridiculous but if it were, the same number of mothers and fathers, 8,589,934,592, would have been required in your 43rd generation back, and that would have been in the year of their birth 40 A.D.

This is simple arithmetic; and any simpleton knows that everyone has to have had a mother and a father to be alive. Those are the only ones who are being counted here. Your siblings don't count as ancestors of yours. Duh!   

Now let's look at the Wikipedia reported world population of people currently alive:

Wikipedia says: "In demographics, the world population is the total number of humans currently living, and [it] was estimated to have reached 7.7 billion people as of November 2018.[1] It took over 200,000 years of human history for the world's population to reach 1 billion;[2] and only 200 years more to reach 7 billion.[3]" [That totals 220,000 years]

[1] "World Population Clock: 7.6 Billion People (2017) - Worldometers". www.worldometers.info. Retrieved 2018-05-13.
[2] "World Population to Hit Milestone With Birth of 7 Billionth Person". PBS NewsHour. Retrieved 11 February 2018.
[3] "World population hits 6 billion". 4 March 2004. Retrieved 11 February 2018.

That is the currently estimated living population of the world. So each of those living persons has to have had the same number of mother and father ancestors as do we. If none of them are siblings, which is not true as some are, but if they were not, that would mean the number of mother and father ancestors in any generation would have to be multiplied by 7.7 billion.

I won't bother to do that, as the above number calculated for a single person's one generation in 1580 B.C. is already ridiculously large; and that was only 3,580 years ago, which is not even close to 220,000 years ago. (3,580/220,000 = 0.01627272727... which is only 1.627% of that period of time)

OK, so now what is your answer to this obvious truth?

"Goin' Fishin' Early" by The Unknown Artist

"Goin' Fishin' Early" is mixed media computer graphics and oil on canvas art by The Unknown Artist.

 

Which man is Bill Blythe III's real father?

Bill Blythe III was the name given to the baby after his mother's traveling salesman husband died in a car accident before he was born. She had married him after getting pregnant with a baby by an undisclosed man who was not her husband (she didn't have one yet). After Bill Blythe Jr. died in the accident, his mother married William Jefferson Clinton, and Bill Blythe III changed his name in an Arkansas court to William Jefferson Clinton Jr.

These pictures show the man who died, Bill Blythe Jr. (first) and WJC, Jr. with the former governor of Arkansas, Winthrop Rockefeller (second below). Now you can decide which one was most likely his real father by blood.

 

"In a Quiet Calming Place" by The Unknown Artist

"In a Quiet Calming Place," mixed media computer graphics and oil on canvas art by The Unknown Artist

 

Art to Die For (not mine, no, it's not mine)

No explanation is needed.
Go here to see what an undertaking art has become.

"Children's Dreams" by The Unknown Artist

"Children's Dreams," mixed media computer graphics and oil on canvas art by The Unknown Artist

 

"Fire Down Below" by The Unknown Artist

"Fire Down Below," mixed media computer graphics and oil on canvas art by The Unknown Artist

 

"Bali High" by The Unknown Artist

"Bali High," mixed media computer graphics and oil on canvas art by The Unknown Artist

 

"Raking America Great Again"

This is the latest Trumpery twist of the truth.

Trumpery is controlled opposition, and this kind of statement makes it work.

Go RAGA! 

Can you guess which one is Jerry Brown?
 

"Secret Mountain Rendezvous" by The Unknown Artist

"Secret Mountain Rendezvous," mixed media computer graphics and oil on canvas by The Unknown Artist

 

"C'est la Vie" by The Unknown Artist

"C'est la Vie," mixed media computer graphics and oil on canvas art by The Unknown Artist

"Path to the Great Beyond" by the Unknown Artist

"Path to the Great Beyond," mixed media computer graphics and oil on canvas art by the Unknown Artist

 

"Sierra Redwoods Ablaze" by The Unknown Artist

"Sierra Redwoods Ablaze," mixed media computer graphics and oil on canvas by The Unknown Artist

 

"Rocky Shores" by The Unknown Artist

"Rocky Shores," mixed media computer graphics, photography, and oil on canvas by The Unknown Artist

 

"View from the Window" by The Unknown Artist

"View from the Window," mixed media computer graphics and oil on canvas art by The Unknown Artist

 

"Moonlit Landscape" by The Unknown Artist

"Moonlit Landscape," mixed media computer graphics and oil on canvas by The Unknown Artist

 

"In a Mahler Mood" by The Unknown Artist

"In a Mahler Mood," mixed media computer graphics and oil on canvas art by The Unknown Artist

 

"Indian Village" by The Unknown Artist

"Indian Village," mixed media computer graphics and oil on canvas art by The Unknown Artist

 

"Autumn Leaves" by The Unknown Artist

"Autumn Leaves," mixed media computer graphics and oil on canvas art by The Unknown Artist

 

"Still Mountain Lake" by The Unknown Artist

"Still Mountain Lake," mixed media computer graphics and oil on canvas art by The Unknown Artist

 

"Seen from the Shadows" by The Unknown Artist

"Seen from the Shadows," mixed media computer graphics and oil on canvas art by The Unknown Artist

 

"Earth Flower" by The Unknown Artist

"Earth Flower," mixed media computer graphics and oil on canvas by The Unknown Artist

 

"Tropical Sunrise" by The Unknown Artist

"Tropical Sunrise," mixed media computer graphics and oil on canvas art by The Unknown Artist

 

"Glacial Progression" by The Unknown Artist

"Glacial Progression," mixed media computer graphics and oil on canvas by The Unknown Artist

 

Two posts that support one another

The first one is very intelligently written and does not seem to twist the facts to suit anyone.

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/opinion/30356502

The second one was posted on the newspaper online on the same day. It shows the evidence that the first one presumes and is truly pertinent to.

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/breakingnews/30356505

This is a very interesting turn of events, no matter who did what, and it implicates the Zionist so-called royal family of the Saud family.

Hey, we can't cut of Saudi from military support, as that would be the same as cutting off Israel, and we know Trumpery is not about to do that. That was a tongue in cheek statement, as of course we could, but we know he won't.

Mad, Bad Hat Vote

Here you can vote for the hat that is the worst you have ever seen in your entire life. They are presented in the order found on the internet, not as a way to influence your vote. Each photo is numbered and when there is more than one hat shown in the photo, there is a number with a left, right, or middle choice.

These are photos of Princess Eugenie, sometimes with Princess Beatrix, and sometimes with others in addition to them. PE got married, so there are a lot of photos of her on line now. The categories that determine the choice of the winner are for the most ridiculous, unattractive, unbecoming, unbelievable, untenable, or unforgettably bad hat.

Photo 1.

This is Princess Eugenie 1(L) and Princess Beatrice 1(R).

Photo 2.

 This is Princess Beatrice 2(L) and Princess Eugenie 1(R).

 Photo 3.

This is probably Princess Eugenie's mother 3(L) with Princess Eugenie 3(R), but they were not identified with this photo. Notice that the 3(L) hat has black bear attached to it from behind.

Photo 4.

This is Princess Eugenie 4(L) glaring, while her sister 4(R) looks at her with some doubt as to the advisability of her attitude. There is a 4(C) red hat that can be included in the voting also, and the officer wearing it is obviously very unimpressed at attending the event. Thus there area three hats to chose from in it.

Photo 5.

This is Queen Elizabeth 5(L) giving something to Princess Eugenie 5(R).

Photo 6.

This is an identified celebrity wedding guest 6(L) with a hat that has a pig attached to the back of it.

Photo 7.

 All Princess Eugenie 7(L,C,R)

Photo 8.

Princess Eugenie 8(L) and Princess Beatrice 8(R)


Photo 9.

Princess Eugenie 9, with a hat that could fall off at any moment now. She looks aware of that fact.

Photo 10.

This is Prince Andrew and it appears to be Prince Charles' second wife 10(L), his stepmother, beside Princess Eugenie 10(R), but identification of the persons was not given.

Photo 11.

This is Princess Eugenie 11 expressing her displeasure at her hat.

Now it is time to vote for the "Worst Hat You've Ever Seen in Your Entire Life."

"First Sign of Winter's Approach" by The Unknown Artist

"First Sign of Winter's Approach," mixed media computer graphics and oil on canvas and plaster by The Unknown Artist

 

"Magic Lamp" by The Unknown Artist

"Magic Lamp," mixed media computer graphics and oil on canvas by The Unknown Artist

 

Kavanaugh's Senate Confirmation according to their script

Following the script of Disney's "Alice in Wonderland" to a Tea, Bret wanders into the Senate Judiciary hearing, and the following scripted dialog was then followed:

At the hearing table are Republicrat Jeff "Flakey" (Sen. from Arizona), who is playing the part of the Mad Hatter. And beside him sits Demopublican Diane "FineCups" (Sen. from California), who is playing the part of the March Hare.

Bret sees them celebrating happily together and wishing each other a "Happy un-Supreme Court cloture vote day" with a chorus of other Senate members and MSM reporters accompanying them, singing from testimony pots.

Bret sits down and watches, and when the song ends, he claps, and Flakey and FineCups notice him and say, "No room, no room."

Bret says: But I thought there was plenty of room.

FineCups says: Ahh, but it is very rude to sit down without being invited.

Flakey adds: I'll say its rude, [pointing at Bret] it's very, very rude indeed.

One of the MSM reporters, playing the part of the mouse in a teapot, sticks his head up and says, "It's very, very, very rude indeed," and sinks back down into the pot.

Bret say: Well, I am very sorry, but I did enjoy your singing and wonder if you could tell me . . . .

FineCups [interrupting him] says: You enjoyed our singing?

Flakey says: Oh, what a delightful child. I got so excited. We never get compliments. You must have a cup of tease.

FineCups says: Ah yes, indeed, a tease, you must have a cup of tease.

Bret says: That would be very nice. I'm sorry I interrupted your Supreme Court cloture vote day party.

FineCups says [with a chuckle] Supreme Court cloture vote day? Oh, my dear child, this is not a Supreme Court cloture vote day party.

Flakey says: Of course not. This is an un-Supreme Court cloture vote day party.

Bret says: Un-Supreme Court cloture vote day? Well, I'm sorry, but I don't quite understand.

FineCups says: An un-Supreme Court cloture vote day is like, ... thirty days has Sep . . . no, well, an un-Supreme Court cloture vote day, if you have a Supreme Court cloture vote day and then you . . . [snickers] She doesn't know what an un-Supreme Court cloture vote day is.

Flakey says: How silly. Ahh shall elucidate. [the chorus of Senators and MSM reporters in tease pots start singing as FineCups directs them]

Flakey continues: Our statistic prove, prove that you've got one Supreme Court cloture vote day.

FineCups adds: Imagine that . . . one Supreme Court cloture vote day every year.

Flakey continues: Ahhhh, but there are three hundred and sixty four uuunnn-Supreme Court cloture vote days.

FineCups [still directing the chorus of Senators] says: Exactly why we've gathered here to cheer.

Bret happily says: Why, then its my un-Supreme Court cloture vote day too.

FineCups says: It is?

Flakey adds: What a small world this is.

FineCups says: In that case . . .

Both FineCups and Flakey start dancing around Bret singing: Aaaaaa very un-Supreme Court cloture vote day . . .

Bret [singing with them] says: To me?

FineCups and Flakey sing: To you. Aaaaaa very un-Supreme Court cloture vote day . . .

Bret [singing with them] says: For me?

Flakey says: For you, now blow the candle out, my dear, and make your wish come true.

When Bret blows out the candle, it flies into the air with fireworks as they sing "A very un-Supreme Court cloture vote day to you."

The MSM media mouse descends from the explosing fireworks singing, "Twinkle, twinkle little spot, up above the world you fly, like a twinkle in the sky," and goes back into a tease pot.

Bret claps and says: Oh, that was lovely.

Flakey says: And uh, and now my dear, you were saying that you would like to seek . . . and you were seeking some information of some kind.

Bret says: Oh yes, you see I'm looking for . . .

Flakey interrupts Bret and says: Clean evidence! Clean evidence! Move downnnnnnnn!

Bret says: But I haven't used my evidence.

FineCups sings: Clean evidence, clean evidence, move down, move down, clean evidence, clean evidence, move down.

Flakey says to Bret: Would you like to give a little more testimony?

Bret says: Well, I haven't given any yet, so a can't say a little bit more.

FineCups says: Ah you mean, you can't say a little bit less.

Flakey says: Yes, you can always give more of something.

Bret says: But I didn't know . . .

Flakey says: And now, my dear, something seems to be troubling you. Ahh, won't you tell us all about it?

FineCups says: Start at the beginning.

Flakey says: Yes, ahh, and when you come to the end [chuckles] . . . stop.

Bret says: Well, It all started while I was sitting in the Oral Orifice with Donald.

FineCups says: Verry Interrresting, . . . who's Donald?

Bret says: Well, Donald is my POTUS. You see . . .

At this, the MSM reporter [on que] jumps out of his testimony pot yelling "POTUS" and runs across the Senate Hearing room breaking all the decorum with the cheers of those paid Soreass protesters in the balcony.
When the Capitol Police have caught him and put him back in his testimony pot, FineCups says, "Get the cam!" and that appears to calm the MSM reporter down.

Flakey says: Oh, humpf, those are the things that upset me.

FineCups says: See all the trouble you've started?

Bret says: Well, I didn't think . . .

FineCups says: That's the point. If you don't think you shouldn't talk.

Flakey shouts: Clean evidence! Clean evidence! Move down! Move down! Move downnnnnnnn!

Bret objects: But I didn't . . .

FineCups says: Move down.

Flakey says: And now, my dear, as you were saying . . .

Bret says: Oh yes, I was sitting in the Oral Orifice with uh . . . with you know who.

Flakey says: I do! ha ha ha.

Bret continues: I mean my POT . . .

Flakey says: "T!"

FineCups says: In just a half an hour, if you don't mind.

Flakey says: Come, come, my dear, don't you care for testimony.

Bret says: Oh yes, I am very fond of testimony. But . . .

FineCups says: If you don't care for testimony, at least make polite conversation.

Bret says in a raised voice: Well, I have been trying to ask you . . .

FineCups bangs the gavel on the bench and says: I have an excellent idea. Let's change the subject.

At this FineCups hits Flakey over the head with the gavel. He awakens and says: Why is a raving Repulicrat like a right wing Demopublican?

Bret says: Riddles? Let me see now. Why is a raving Repulicrat like a right wing Demopublican?

Flakey says: I beg your pardon.

Bret repeats: Why is a raving Repulicrat like a right wing Demopublican?

Flakey goes into shock and shouts: Why is a what?

FineCups runs over behind Flakey and says: He's stark raving mad.

Bret, having had enough, stands and says: But its your silly riddle. You just said . . .

FineCups says: Have a nice bit of testimony.

Bret says: A nice bit of testimony indeed! I'm sorry, but I just haven't the time.

He turns to leave the hearing room when FineCups yells: The time, who's got the time.

At this que the plaintiff, Ms Rabid, who plays the part of White Rabbit, runs in saying "No time, no time, hello, goodbye, I'm late.

Bret says: The White Rabid . . .

Ms Rabid says: Oh, I'm so late.

Flakey says: Well, no wonder you're late now. Your testimony is exactly thirty-six years slow.

Ms Rabid says: Thirty-six years slow?

Flakey says: Of course you're late. Ha ha ha. Oh my goodness, we'll have to look into this. Ahaa, I see what's wrong with this. Why this testimony is full of deals.

Ms Rabid says: Oh my goodness, oh my goodness, you're kidding, but, but, but, but, but. . .

Flakey says: But hers, but hers, it needs some rebutters. [shouting] Rebutters!

Ms Rabid says: But, but, but, rebutters?

Flakey says: Oh let's see, rebutters, that's fine.

Ms Rabid says: No, no, no.

Flakey says: These are the best rebutters. [to Ms Rabid he says] What are you talking about?

FineCups says: "T?"

Flakey says: "T." Oh I never thought of testimony. Of course.

Ms Rabid says: Not testimony.

FineCups says: Schummer?

Flakey says: Schummer. Yes, two looneys, yes, two looneys, thank you, yes.

Ms Rabid says: Don't cram, be careful.

Flakey says: I forgot all about Graham.

FineCups says: Bluster?

Flakey says: Bluster, yes, bluster! . . . [changing his mind] Don't let's be silly. Kremlin that's . . . ha ha ha.

Flakey bangs his hand on the table and says: That should do it.

To the pretended shock of the Judiciary Committee, the hearing room disrupts in chaos until FineCups bangs the gavel saying "There is only one way to restore order."

Flakey says to Ms Rabid: Thirty-six years late, that's what it is.

Ms Rabid says: Oh, my testimony.

Flakey says: It was?

Ms Rabid says: And it was an un-Supreme Court cloture vote day for me.

Flakey and FineCups throw Ms Rabid out of the hearing rooms while singing "A very merry un-Supreme Court cloture vote day to you."

Bret follows Ms Rabid saying: Ms Rabid, oh Ms Rabid, aaah, now where did she go to?

Bret [looking back at the Senators singing together] says: Of all the silly nonsense. This is the stupidest Senate Judiciary Supreme Court cloture vote day session I've ever been to in all my life.

Bret storms off.

The script ended here. But he is sworn in twice (?) when the Constitution only requires it once.

This script has worked very well for all those conspiring, colluding Demopublican and Republicrat politicians. Hey, that's entertainment, and what better way than to use a Disney script to divide and conquer the public before an election? Get everyone to believe that they are actually opposing parties and the scam becomes successful.

This might seem as though it is a satire, but it is the truth behind their political agitation propaganda battle.

So you still think that the Demopublicans and Republicrats are fighting, right?

The current diversion of attention using the collusion of the two parties to create the appearance of a great disagreement is really just serving two purposes:
1. Get attention drawn away from the real subversive invasion by the Mossad/Israel/ISIS that is allowed to continue and is not mentioned in the investigations of Trumpery instead of Russia.
2. Get women to be angry with men so that the sexes can be set at each other's throats as they have done with the black/white privilege rubbish for years.

So, let's go back and review what the election of Trumpery was all about and who decided it. The following link goes to an article posted before the election in 2016, on November 9th. It explains why Trumpery will trump Hitlary for the NWO Zionists purposes in NYC and all other places supporting the Zionist agenda. (Saudi Arabia, Iran, London, Brussels, Berlin, Paris, just to name a few).
Why-the-globalists-will-announce-trump-as-the-winner-of-the-election

Now we go to the result of that choice as it is seen in DC with the false appearance of a Republicrat/Demopublican fight over Bret Kavanaugh's placement on the US Supreme Court. They must be laughing their butts off behind closed doors at the show that they have fooled everyone into believing -- that they are so opposed to each other.

But there is a lot more to this than just that. It is in the long-term plans that they have been following up on for thousands of years. Want to know how it really works? Read as much as you can of the information on the following page and you will find out. Yes, Trumpery is a good part of it.
Understanding the NWO Strategy

That's all I want to say, as the above page has it all and then some.

"Watching Her Love Depart with the Fleet" by The Unknown Artist

"Watching Her Love Depart with the Fleet," mixed media computer graphics and oil on canvas art by The Unknown Artist

 

"River Reverie" by The Unknown Artist

"River Reverie," mixed media computer graphics and oil on canvas art by The Unknown Artist